Who are you looking for?
Complete your ancestor’s life story with his London burial record. The entries were restricted 'as far as possible' to burials of adult males, and give the first name, last name, year of death and the burial ground.
Each record includes a transcript of the original record.
This dataset, completed by Percival Boyd in 1934, is an index to some 243,000 of the burials in the London area 1538-1872. Where the age at death was given in the original records Boyd recorded this, but only a small proportion of the records contain the age.
Boyd's London Burial Index coverage is strongest for the parishes in the cities of London and Westminster and south and east Middlesex. There are three parishes south of the Thames in what was Surrey (Bermondsey, Camberwell and Clapham) and four from north Kent (Deptford, Greenwich Hospital, Lee and Lewisham). Finally, East Ham and Little Ilford in what was then Essex are included.
Boyd initially intended the period covered to encompass the years 1538-1853. Why 1853? Because burials in the inner London churchyards and burial grounds, such as Bunhill Fields, were discontinued for health reasons at various dates in the 1850s and no further burial registers were maintained. In fact, many parishes in the index are only represented by burials up to 1754, 1812 or 1837 and some are even earlier than this. On the other hand, two go some way beyond the cut-off date: Twickenham to 1872 and St. Paul's Cathedral to 1871. For a full list of parishes and dates included read the Boyd’s London Burials parish list found in the Useful Links and Resources.
Many of the burials included are only extractions from the registers. No children under the age of 12 have been knowingly included nor women over this age. In some cases the sex of the deceased may have been uncertain from the information given in the register.
Boyd commented: 'Those who use this index are warned that it must be treated as a 'lucky dip', if you find what you want, well and good; if you don't, you have searched nothing.' He means, of course, that in those pre-internet days, you had not spent hours if not days trawling through un-indexed burial records in remote cemeteries.
The reason for its compilation is implied in an article that appeared in an introductory article in the Genealogists' Magazine March 1935 in which Boyd suggests that: 'Only males are included (children being omitted when so designated in the registers), because for genealogical purposes the date of a man's death is more important than that of a woman who, unless she were sole [a spinster] or a widow, could not make a will except with the consent of her husband.'
After an extensive search, only one burial has been identified that may have been for a woman: in 1643 the index states that a 'Dian Wine' was buried at St. Margaret, Westminster. The printed transcript of the register in the library gives the full date but spells the first name as 'Dyan'. It is possible that this was a man baptised Dionis or Dionysius, rather than Diane or Diana. When in doubt, the entry was apparently included just in case.
The original index was 'made with the co-operation of the College of Arms' and includes a collection of 87 volumes of extracts of parish registers copied and nearly all indexed by the American genealogist, Colonel Joseph Lemuel Chester (1821-1882) deposited at the college.
Take a look at these other related record sets suggested by Findmypast’s genealogy experts.